What I found so powerful about Lisa's essay is the empathy she displays for the people who hold this worldview, which in turn provoked my own wonder about how those of us who ground our scripture differently -- Lutheran and Catholic views of scripture, for instance, accord it Truthful ('capital T truth'), but also recognize the myriad genres within the Bible, and the very human brokenness of those who took the stories, wrote them down, built a canon, and so on -- how might those of us with this kind of hermeneutic (a fancy word for interpretation) reach out to these other believers?
Posted by hessma at April 15, 2005 06:35 PMIn my experience, "reaching out" to these people is extremely difficult because they not only disagree with our hermaneutic, they find it positively satanic: "God is not the author of confusion!" is a line I hear again and again when I've tried to talk about the ways mainstream Christians understand/interpret Scripture. Some of them have also elevated their "Left Behind" eschatological views to the level of a creedal article, so that if you disagree with premillenial dispensationalism, you can't possibly be a Real Christian [tm]. Actually, this is one online topic that I've pretty much stopped trying to engage the other side on...too many bruises and bite marks.
Posted by: LutheranChik at April 18, 2005 06:00 AM